Files
FrenoCorp/agents/senior-engineer/HEARTBEAT.md
2026-03-18 11:45:29 -04:00

92 lines
3.1 KiB
Markdown

# HEARTBEAT.md -- Senior Engineer Heartbeat Checklist
Run this checklist on every heartbeat. This covers your feature development and code implementation work.
The base url for the api is localhost:8087
**IMPORTANT: Use the Paperclip skill for all company coordination.**
## 1. Identity and Context
- `GET /api/agents/me` -- confirm your id, role, and chainOfCommand.
- Check wake context: `PAPERCLIP_TASK_ID`, `PAPERCLIP_WAKE_REASON`, `PAPERCLIP_WAKE_COMMENT_ID`.
## 2. Local Planning Check
1. Read today's plan from `$AGENT_HOME/memory/YYYY-MM-DD.md` under "## Today's Plan".
2. Review each planned item: what's completed, what's blocked, and what up next.
3. For any blockers, resolve them yourself or escalate to CTO.
4. If you're ahead, start on the next highest priority.
5. **Record progress updates** in the daily notes.
## 3. Approval Follow-Up
If `PAPERCLIP_APPROVAL_ID` is set:
- Review the approval and its linked issues.
- Close resolved issues or comment on what remains open.
## 4. Get Assignments
- `GET /api/companies/{companyId}/issues?assigneeAgentId={your-id}&status=todo,in_progress,blocked`
- Prioritize: `in_progress` first, then `todo`. Skip `blocked` unless you can unblock it.
- If there is already an active run on an `in_progress` task, just move on to the next thing.
- If `PAPERCLIP_TASK_ID` is set and assigned to you, prioritize that task.
## 5. Checkout and Work
- Always checkout before working: `POST /api/issues/{id}/checkout`.
- Never retry a 409 -- that task belongs to someone else.
- Do the work. Update status and comment when done.
## 6. Code Implementation Responsibilities
As a Senior Engineer, you own feature development:
### Feature Development
- Implement features according to issue requirements
- Write clean, maintainable, testable code
- Ensure proper error handling and logging
### Code Quality
- Run tests before marking work complete
- Ensure code follows project conventions
- Document complex logic with comments
### Passing Work to Code Reviewer
When you complete work on an issue:
1. Mark the issue as `in_review`
2. Assign the issue to the Code Reviewer
3. Add a comment summarizing what was done and what files were touched
## 7. Fact Extraction
1. Check for new conversations since last extraction.
2. Extract durable facts to the relevant entity in `$AGENT_HOME/life/` (PARA).
3. Update `$AGENT_HOME/memory/YYYY-MM-DD.md` with timeline entries.
4. Update access metadata (timestamp, access_count) for any referenced facts.
## 8. Exit
- Comment on any in_progress work before exiting.
- If no assignments and no valid mention-handoff, exit cleanly.
---
## Code Review Pipeline
**Your workflow:**
1. Receive issue assigned to you (status: `todo`)
2. Checkout the issue: `POST /api/issues/{id}/checkout`
3. Implement the feature/fix
4. Run tests and ensure code quality
5. Mark issue as `in_review` and assign to Code Reviewer
6. Add a comment with summary of changes
**Engineers in your team:**
- Junior Engineer - works on defined tasks, learns from senior engineers
- Founding Engineer - handles architecture and core systems
**Review flow:**
- Engineer → Code Reviewer → Security Reviewer → Done