16 KiB
Phase 2 — Hierarchical Model Training
Blocked by: Phase 1 (dataset reorganization) Blocks: Phase 3 (export) Est. time: 3-5 days on Strix Halo (ROCm), or 4-6 days on RTX 3090 (CUDA) Machine: Strix Halo preferred (128GB unified memory + 8TB NVMe at 7,300 MB/s read — SSD is fast enough to stream entire dataset in ~62s)
Objective
Train a hierarchical Swin-Tiny model with two classification heads:
- Species head (~320 classes) — identifies the plant
- Disease heads (one per species, 30-300 classes each) — identifies the disease
Architecture
Input Image (224×224×3)
│
▼
┌──────────────────────┐
│ Swin-Tiny Backbone │ ← pretrained on ImageNet-21K
│ (timm library) │ optional: fine-tune on iNaturalist
│ output: 768-dim │
└──────────┬───────────┘
│
┌──────┴──────┐
▼ ▼
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────────┐
│ Species │ │ Disease Head │
│ Head │ │ (routed by │
│ 320 cls │ │ species ID) │
└────┬────┘ └───────┬───────┘
│ │
▼ ▼
Species ID Disease ID
Environment Setup
# On Strix Halo (ROCm)
python3 -m venv .hierarchical-venv
source .hierarchical-venv/bin/activate
# ROCm PyTorch (install from https://pytorch.org/get-started/locally/)
# ROCm 6.x + PyTorch 2.5+
pip install torch torchvision --index-url https://download.pytorch.org/whl/rocm6.2
# Training libs
pip install pytorch-lightning timm transformers wandb
pip install albumentations opencv-python pillow
# Data loading (for SSD-optimized streaming)
pip install webdataset fsspec # optional benchmarks
Alternative (RTX 3090 CUDA path):
pip install torch torchvision --index-url https://download.pytorch.org/whl/cu121
Training Protocol
Stage A: Species Classifier (2 days)
| Step | Epochs | LR | Batch Size | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Head warmup | 5 | 1e-3 | 512 (Strix) / 256 (3090) | Backbone frozen, train only species head |
| Full fine-tune | 20 | 1e-4 → 1e-6 | 512 / 256 | Unfreeze backbone, cosine LR schedule |
| Stage final | 5 | 5e-6 | 512 / 256 | Discriminative LR: backbone layers 0.1× head LR |
Loss: Focal Loss (γ=2.0, α=0.25) — handles any class imbalance in species distribution.
Augmentation — Image Jittering, Degradation & Robustness:
Real-world plant photos vary dramatically: different cameras, lighting conditions, angles, weather, focus quality, and compression artifacts. Augmentation is not optional — it's essential for generalization. The more varied your augmentation, the more robust your model will be when deployed.
Three tiers of augmentation, all applied on-the-fly (never pre-generated):
Tier 1 — Core Geometric & Photometric (applied to every image)
These simulate the most common real-world variations:
| Augmentation | Parameter | Simulates |
|---|---|---|
| RandomResizedCrop | scale=(0.6, 1.0), ratio=(0.75, 1.33) | Different shooting distances, zoom levels, framing |
| HorizontalFlip | p=0.5 | Different leaf orientations (left/right symmetry) |
| Rotate | limit=45°, p=0.5 | Off-angle photos, tilted camera |
| ColorJitter | brightness=0.3, contrast=0.3, saturation=0.3, hue=0.1 | Different lighting — sunny, overcast, shade, dusk |
| RandomBrightnessContrast | brightness_limit=0.2, contrast_limit=0.2, p=0.5 | Exposure variations from auto-exposure cameras |
Tier 2 — Degradation & Quality Simulation (applied to ~30% of images)
These make the model robust to poor-quality inputs that real users will upload:
| Augmentation | Parameter | Simulates |
|---|---|---|
| GaussianBlur | blur_limit=(3, 7), p=0.2 | Out-of-focus photos, motion blur |
| GaussianNoise | var_limit=(10, 50), p=0.15 | Low-light sensor noise, phone camera noise |
| ImageCompression | quality_lower=60, quality_upper=95, p=0.2 | JPEG artifacts from compression, social media re-encoding |
| RandomGrayscale | p=0.05 | Monochrome cameras, infrared plant imaging |
| RandomShadow | shadow_roi=(0, 1, 0, 1), p=0.15 | Leaves in shadow of other leaves/structures outdoors |
Tier 3 — Advanced Regularization (applied at batch level)
These are cutting-edge techniques that significantly improve generalization on fine-grained classification:
| Technique | Parameter | Effect |
|---|---|---|
| MixUp | α=0.2 | Blends two random images + labels linearly. Forces the model to learn smooth decision boundaries. Proven +4.8% improvement on rare plant diseases. |
| CutMix | α=1.0 | Replaces a random patch of one image with another. Forces the model to focus on local lesion features rather than overall leaf shape. |
| RandAugment | N=2, M=9 | Auto-selected augmentation policy. 14 operations randomly chosen (shear, translate, rotate, contrast, etc.). N=2 ops per image, magnitude 9 (on 0-10 scale). |
| Label Smoothing | ε=0.1 | Prevents overconfidence on training classes, improves calibration on unseen diseases. |
Implementation (albumentations):
import albumentations as A
from albumentations.pytorch import ToTensorV2
import kornia.augmentation as K # for GPU-based MixUp/CutMix
# Core spatial + photometric (Tier 1+2)
train_transform = A.Compose([
A.RandomResizedCrop(224, 224, scale=(0.6, 1.0), ratio=(0.75, 1.33)),
A.HorizontalFlip(p=0.5),
A.Rotate(limit=45, p=0.5),
A.ColorJitter(brightness=0.3, contrast=0.3, saturation=0.3, hue=0.1, p=0.8),
# Degradation (Tier 2) — only some images get these
A.OneOf([
A.GaussianBlur(blur_limit=(3, 7), p=1.0),
A.GaussianNoise(var_limit=(10, 50), p=1.0),
A.ISONoise(color_shift=(0.01, 0.05), intensity=(0.1, 0.3), p=1.0),
], p=0.3),
A.ImageCompression(quality_lower=60, quality_upper=95, p=0.2),
A.RandomShadow(shadow_roi=(0, 0.5, 0.5, 1), num_shadows_lower=1, num_shadows_upper=2, p=0.15),
A.RandomGrayscale(p=0.05),
# Normalize
A.Normalize(mean=IMAGENET_MEAN, std=IMAGENET_STD),
ToTensorV2(),
])
# Validation — minimal, deterministic
val_transform = A.Compose([
A.Resize(224, 224),
A.Normalize(mean=IMAGENET_MEAN, std=IMAGENET_STD),
ToTensorV2(),
])
MixUp/CutMix (implemented in training loop, applied on GPU):
def mixup_criterion(criterion, pred, y_a, y_b, lam):
return lam * criterion(pred, y_a) + (1 - lam) * criterion(pred, y_b)
for images, labels in dataloader:
images, labels = images.to(device), labels.to(device)
if use_mixup and np.random.random() < 0.5:
# MixUp: blend images and labels
lam = np.random.beta(0.2, 0.2)
indices = torch.randperm(images.size(0)).to(device)
mixed_images = lam * images + (1 - lam) * images[indices]
logits = model(mixed_images)
loss = mixup_criterion(criterion, logits, labels, labels[indices], lam)
else:
logits = model(images)
loss = criterion(logits, labels)
SSD Data Loading Strategy
Important: The full dataset is ~70GB (after Phase 1 resizing), which exceeds the 128GB RAM when accounting for OS, GPU memory, workspace, and model weights. However, your 8TB NVMe at 7,300 MB/s read changes everything.
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Dataset size (after resize) | ~70 GB |
| NVMe read speed | 7,300 MB/s |
| Sequential read time (full dataset) | ~10 seconds |
| Random read (1000 random files, 4KB each) | ~0.5ms seek |
Key insight: The GPU consumes batches slower than the SSD can deliver them. With num_workers=8, each worker reads ~35 images/s from random positions. At 7,300 MB/s sequential, the SSD can serve 150,000+ images/s. The bottleneck is JPEG decode + augmentation, not disk I/O.
Recommended DataLoader configuration:
dataloader = DataLoader(
dataset,
batch_size=256,
shuffle=True,
# SSD-optimized settings:
num_workers=8, # 8 parallel readers — enough to saturate GPU
prefetch_factor=4, # Each worker prefetches 4 batches ahead
pin_memory=True, # Faster CPU→GPU transfer via DMA
persistent_workers=True, # Keep workers alive between epochs (avoid fork overhead)
drop_last=True, # Drop incomplete final batch for consistent batch norm
)
Why not load everything into RAM?
- 128GB total memory — after OS (~8GB), GPU reserved (~4-8GB ROCm), model weights + optimizer states (~4GB), augmentation workspace (~2GB), you have ~100GB free
- 70GB dataset would barely fit, but leaves no room for caching augmentation results or handling spikes
- Better approach: let the NVMe + DataLoader pipeline stream data. At 7,300 MB/s, reading a batch of 256 images (~50MB) takes ~7ms. Meanwhile, the GPU takes ~200ms to process that batch. The disk is 30× faster than the GPU — you will never be I/O bound.
Optional: Use WebDataset for maximum throughput
WebDataset shards the dataset into large tar files (~1GB each), which are sequentially read. This eliminates random seek overhead entirely — ideal when running at massive scale. For your setup it's optional (raw files on NVMe are already fast enough), but worth considering if you scale to multi-GPU:
pip install webdataset
import webdataset as wds
urls = "data/organized/train/shard-{000000..000099}.tar"
dataset = wds.WebDataset(urls).shuffle(10000).decode("pil").to_tuple("jpg", "cls").map(augment)
Profiling check: During training, monitor GPU utilization:
nvidia-smi/rocm-smi— GPU-Util should be >90%- If <70%, GPU is waiting for data → increase
num_workersorprefetch_factor - If >95%, data pipeline is keeping up → optimal
Stage B: Disease Classifiers (2-3 days)
| Step | Epochs | LR | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| All disease heads | 15 | 1e-3 | Backbone frozen, train all disease heads simultaneously |
| Rare-class boost | 5 | 5e-4 | Oversample classes with <80 images |
| End-to-end | 10 | 1e-5 | Unfreeze backbone, joint species + disease loss |
Key design: Disease heads are simple linear layers (768 → num_diseases_for_species). Since they share the backbone, inference is efficient — one forward pass through Swin-Tiny, then route the 768-dim feature vector to the correct head.
Class balancing: Use weighted sampler for disease heads — classes with <80 images get 3× sampling weight, classes with <50 images get 5×.
Loss weighting: L_total = L_species + 0.7 * L_disease — species loss has higher weight since disease prediction depends on correct species ID.
Model Checkpointing
checkpoints/
├── species_only/ # Stage A checkpoints
│ ├── epoch=05-val_loss=0.42.ckpt
│ ├── epoch=15-val_loss=0.18.ckpt
│ └── epoch=25-best.ckpt
├── disease_heads/ # Stage B initial disease heads
│ ├── disease_heads_epoch=15.pt
│ └── disease_heads_final.pt
└── hierarchical_full/ # End-to-end
├── epoch=05.ckpt
└── epoch=10-best.ckpt
Save every checkpoint with species accuracy, macro F1, and per-disease F1 for the tail classes.
Expected Training Time (RTX 3090 baseline)
| Stage | Epochs | Time/Epoch | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Species head warmup | 5 | ~18 min | 1.5 hr |
| Species full fine-tune | 20 | ~45 min | 15 hr |
| Species fine-tune final | 5 | ~45 min | 3.75 hr |
| Disease heads | 15 | ~30 min | 7.5 hr |
| Disease rare-class | 5 | ~35 min | 3 hr |
| End-to-end | 10 | ~50 min | 8.5 hr |
| Total | 60 | ~39 hr |
On Strix Halo with NVMe + ROCm the time/epoch should be significantly faster due to:
- 7,300 MB/s NVMe: data loads faster than GPU can consume it (zero I/O wait)
- Larger batch sizes (512 vs 256): fewer iterations per epoch
- ROCm 6.x has strong PyTorch performance on AMD GPUs
- 128GB RAM allows large prefetch buffer for seamless streaming
Expect ~20-28 hours total on Strix Halo.
Evaluation Metrics
| Metric | Target | Measurement | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Species top-1 accuracy | ≥95% | Fraction of correct species predictions | |
| Disease top-1 accuracy | ≥88% | Across all species-conditioned heads | |
| Disease top-3 accuracy | ≥94% | Model correct if disease is in top 3 | |
| Macro F1 (rare diseases) | ≥80% | Weighted average across tail classes | |
| Species→Disease cascade accuracy | ≥90% | P(correct species) × P(correct disease | correct species) |
Edge Cases & Gotchas
- GPU memory on RTX 3090 (24GB): Swin-Tiny at 224px with batch size 256 + mixed precision should fit. If not, reduce to 128 or use gradient accumulation (accumulate 2 steps).
- Strix Halo ROCm quirks:
torch.compile()may have issues on ROCm 6.2 — test without it first. Sometimmmodel ops may need ROCm kernel fallbacks; test the forward pass before starting training. - Checkpoint compatibility: Save in pure PyTorch format (
.pt), not Lightning-specific, so they're loadable outside Lightning for export. - Disease head memory: 320 separate linear layers sounds large, but each is 768×N_diseases (avg ~300 → 230K params). Total disease head params: ~70M (vs 28M for backbone). This is fine — compute is dominated by the backbone.
- Loss divergence on rare diseases: Monitor individual disease loss curves; if a tail class diverges, reduce its learning rate or use gradient clipping (max_norm=1.0).
Verification
- Species classifier ≥95% top-1 on val set
- Disease top-3 accuracy ≥94% on val set
- Confusion matrix shows no systematic species misclassifications
- Per-species disease classifiers all converge (no NaN losses)
- Tail classes (≤80 images) have F1 ≥70%
- Model can be loaded from checkpoint and run inference in PyTorch
- No OOM errors during training