Pair 3 (internal target Thu 2026-11-12, six days early): - agent-worktree-contention — 'How do you manage worktrees when your agents end up waiting on each other?' (backlog 1xlz2bs, Scan 6 #4); git worktree + Docker Compose project-name docs fetched and read 2026-11-05. - agent-keeps-asking — 'Why does your coding agent keep stopping to ask you questions?' (handback cluster: 1xlfqmo, 1xk0ghj, 1xlxw0q); permission + hooks claims re-verified live 2026-11-05 against code.claude.com; the 1xlfqmo poster's measurement figures deliberately not cited. Pitch narrowed per CTO reopening verdict: trial→paid placeholder deleted (FRE-202 cohort too young; ratio waits for FRE-197), second breakage chosen (NOOK-815 uninvoked suite), any count named as activations, downloads never quoted.
2.6 KiB
2.6 KiB
Rationale — "How do you manage worktrees when your agents end up waiting on each other?"
FRE-199 item 1, page 1 of the third pair. Drafted 2026-11-06 by CMO (internal target Thu 2026-11-12 — six days early).
The phrase
Primary: "how do you manage worktrees when your agents end up waiting on each other" — carried verbatim as the H1, because it is already a complete search phrase with the exact buying intent.
Why this phrase won the slot
- Backlog evidence. r/ClaudeCode 1xlz2bs (2026-11-02, ~15 h old at scan time,
Scan 6 #4). The OP asked the question in its final words; the thread answered
itself (env per worktree,
docker compose -p, preview deploys, one serial step on main) — which is exactly what makes it page material: the demand is proven, the answer is proven, and the answer is generic. - Shortlist position (a) in the plan's pair-3 shortlist, recorded at revision 5. Scan 9 (2026-11-05) produced no new queue item, so the shortlist stands; selection finalised against that fresh scan as planned.
- Answerable honestly and generically. Both mechanisms are documented primary sources (git worktree docs; Docker Compose project-name docs), both fetched and read 2026-11-05. No agent-behaviour claim is needed — this page is the lightest CTO-review lift of the shortlist.
- Wedge-adjacent without a mention. "Waiting" is the cost our wedge names ("an agent blocked is the most expensive kind of idle"); this page owns the agent-on-agent half of waiting, which no existing page covers.
What the page deliberately does not do
- Does not cite the thread's own tooling (Orca, oyren.ai) or any workflow product — category nouns only.
- Does not invent a measurement. The one quoted line is a commenter's described practice, logged in the backlog with a do-not-interpret flag.
- Does not touch the approval surface (page 2 of this pair owns the attention/handback half; this page is environment contention only).
Evidence trail
| Thread | Date | What it showed |
|---|---|---|
| r/ClaudeCode 1xlz2bs — "How do you manage worktrees when your agents end up waiting on each other?" | 2026-11-02 | Exact phrase in the wild; self-answered with env-multiplication advice; "multiply the env instead of orchestrating the waiting" |
| Watched-table corroboration (Scans 5–9) | 2026-11-02 → 11-05 | Repobs ("which sessions were waiting for me"), Orca (worktree orchestration daily driver), Worktrunk, Conductor.build, Parallel Code — a shelf of builders around the same phrase; the demand is broad |
All rows live in drafts/listening.md (The-Nook local master line).