Files
freno-dev/marketing/approved/agent-parallel-tracking/rationale.md
fixture 4dac2e2928 marketing: FRE-199 fact-check verdict applied — second pair drafts/ → approved/
Sponsor fact-check card (FRE-199, interaction a7cba232) answered 2026-11-05
20:21Z: 'Approve both — move to approved/'. Status blockquotes updated to
record the verdict and the date; page bodies untouched.
2026-11-05 20:23:03 +00:00

72 lines
4.4 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
# Rationale — "How do you keep track of multiple coding agents?"
FRE-199 item 1, page 1 of the second pair. Drafted 2026-11-05 by CMO (internal
target Mon 2026-11-09, beaten by four days — the backlog held, so drafting
early cost nothing).
## The phrase
Primary: **"how do you keep track of multiple coding agents running in
parallel"** (variants: "how many sessions before you become the bottleneck",
"which agent is waiting", "agent tracking dashboard").
## Why this phrase won the slot
- **Strongest recurrence in the backlog.** Seven independent threads across
nine scans state the multi-agent attention problem in their own words — more
than any other cluster after the pair-1 phrases. It is the natural next page:
the pair-1 pages answer *one* agent's silence (done-signal) and *one*
permission wait (waiting-on-permission); this is the fleet-scale version of
the same pain, and the buyers are already at fleet scale.
- **Buying intent.** Every quoting operator is running multiple agents *now*
and losing time to supervision, not exploring.
- **Answerable honestly, generically.** The mechanism (per-session hook events
with `session_id`, typed notifications, the status line) is documented in the
agent's own reference; every claim traces to it. No product needed.
- **Distinct from pair 1.** Done-signal owns "one agent, is it finished";
waiting-on-permission owns "one agent, why is it blocked". This page owns
"several agents, which one needs me" — the phrase, the evidence, and the
mechanism (typed Notification matchers, `session_id`, status line) do not
overlap pair 1's.
## Evidence trail
| Thread | Date | What it showed |
|---|---|---|
| r/ClaudeAI 1xmzp2n — "How do you keep track of multiple coding agents running in parallel?" | 2026-11-03 | The exact question as a fresh thread: "How do you notice when one is waiting, done, or stuck?"; two commenters independently: agents "sat waiting on a permission prompt while I was deep in the third", idle "long enough that I lost the thread of what I had asked it to do" |
| r/ClaudeCode 1xh5cum — "Four months of 50+ parallel agent threads a day" | 2026-10-27 | "The limit moved from tokens to my attention"; "fifty a day add up to something I could feel by Friday" |
| r/ClaudeCode 1xdjb2g — "How many sessions can you run before you become the bottleneck?" | 2026-10-23 | 72 comments; the thread went to compute and left the attention half open |
| r/ClaudeCode 1xipsk0 — "~40 Claude Code agents unattended for a month" | 2026-10-29 | "The six hours of silence was the real problem, not the dialog itself" |
| r/ClaudeCode 1xk0ghj — "multiple agents working on multiple projects" | 2026-10-31 | "If every decision routes through you, you're the bottleneck agents were meant to eliminate" |
| Hacker News 50298436 (herdr launch) | 2026-10-30 | A 30-year tmux user's stated switch reason: "visual indication which agent is working and which is waiting for an input" — used in rationale only; the page does not name any tool |
All rows live in `drafts/listening.md` (The-Nook local master line, single
canonical copy per FRE-748) with URLs and verbatim quotes.
## Gates before this page ships
1. **Sponsor fact-check** of the claims table in `copy.md` (owner: Michael
Freno). Page moves `drafts/` → `pending/` → `approved/` on his read, per
the marketing tree's hard rule.
2. **CTO eyes on the agent-behaviour claims** — five doc-sourced claims
(hooks reference ×4, statusline doc ×1), all re-read 2026-11-05. Routed to
the CTO per the FRE-199 plan.
3. **Publish path:** `approved/` → a human places it on nook.freno.me.
Nothing posts itself.
## Ban compliance (FRE-199 + positioning.md rule 1)
- The Nook: not named. The notch, the island, the companion: not mentioned.
- Competitors: not named. The herdr evidence is rationale-only; the page's
"what to check" recommends no tool at all — states and wiring, not products.
- Claude Code is named only as the subject whose documented behaviour the page
explains, with its own docs as the source — same status as pair 1.
- No superlatives, no benchmark numbers, no invented testimonials, no price,
no roadmap dates. Anecdotes are real threads, described without handles.
## Cadence note
Second pair. Queue behind it: the run-without-asking cluster (same pair), the
fan-control phrase, and the invisible-permission variants — above the
three-candidate floor. Two a week holds.