memories and such
This commit is contained in:
@@ -902,3 +902,110 @@ All 4 P1 issues still present:
|
||||
**Status**: Done — All issues fixed, assigned to Security Reviewer
|
||||
|
||||
**Heartbeat Run**: $PAPERCLIP_RUN_ID
|
||||
|
||||
### 2026-05-13 (Wednesday) — FRE-580 Review
|
||||
|
||||
**Issue**: FRE-580 — Email marketing sequences (welcome, nurture, conversion, retention)
|
||||
|
||||
**Context**:
|
||||
- Issue in `in_review` status after Senior Engineer completed implementation
|
||||
- Implementation included: email service, templates for 4 sequences, orchestrator, tRPC router
|
||||
- Files: `email-service.ts` (111 lines), `email-templates.ts` (418 lines), `email-sequence-service.ts` (527 lines), `email-marketing.ts` (156 lines), `appRouter.ts` (33 lines)
|
||||
|
||||
**Action Taken**:
|
||||
- Reviewed all 5 implementation files totaling 1,237 lines
|
||||
- Reviewed schema (`email_marketing.ts`, 132 lines) for completeness
|
||||
- Verified template rendering, variable substitution, and UTM tracking
|
||||
- Analyzed sequence orchestration, enrollment, and scheduling logic
|
||||
- Checked tRPC router endpoints (10 endpoints across templates, preferences, analytics)
|
||||
|
||||
**Findings**:
|
||||
|
||||
**P1 — Critical (3 issues)**:
|
||||
1. **Missing scheduler integration** (`email-sequence-service.ts:165`): `processDueSteps` is the core scheduling mechanism but is never called by any scheduler. No cron job or event loop exists.
|
||||
2. **Welcome sequence enrollment not wired** (`email-sequence-service.ts:124`): `triggerEvent: 'user_signed_up'` has no handler that calls `enrollUser()` after signup. New users never enter the welcome sequence.
|
||||
3. **Email send status tracking incomplete** (`email-sequence-service.ts:267-275`): Resend API returns message ID on success, not status. Code treats `id` as `sent` but doesn't track delivery lifecycle (delivered, opened, clicked, bounced, unsubscribed). No webhook handlers implemented.
|
||||
|
||||
**P2 — High (4 issues)**:
|
||||
4. **No deduplication for concurrent scheduler runs** (`email-sequence-service.ts:165-216`): No mutex or row-level locking. Duplicate emails possible on concurrent runs.
|
||||
5. **tRPC `processSequence` allows any authenticated user** (`email-marketing.ts:135-145`): Should be admin-only.
|
||||
6. **`enrollSequence` accepts empty email** (`email-marketing.ts:111`): Hardcoded empty string instead of fetching current user email.
|
||||
7. **Template initialization stepNumber mapping fragile** (`email-sequence-service.ts:98-110`): Uniqueness check uses `stepNumber === delayHours` but stepNumber is mapped (0→1, 24→2, 72→3). Lookup will never find existing templates, causing duplicates.
|
||||
|
||||
**P3 — Minor (5 issues)**:
|
||||
8. No unsubscribe link tracking (no API endpoint for unsubscribe action)
|
||||
9. No rate limiting on email sending (could hit Resend API limits)
|
||||
10. Analytics query uses string concatenation for SQL (bypasses parameter binding)
|
||||
11. No error handling for email service failures (failed emails silently lost)
|
||||
12. No A/B testing implementation beyond schema (no traffic splitting, variant selection, or significance tracking)
|
||||
|
||||
**Result**:
|
||||
- Code review complete — 3 P1, 4 P2, 5 P3 issues found
|
||||
- Architecture is sound: template registry pattern, drizzle-orm schema, tRPC router design
|
||||
- P1 issues must be resolved before passing to Security Reviewer
|
||||
|
||||
**Assigned to**: Senior Engineer (c99c4ede-feab-4aaa-a9a5-17d81cd80644) for P1 fixes
|
||||
|
||||
**Status**: in_progress — Assigned back for fixes
|
||||
|
||||
**Review Document**: `/home/mike/code/FrenoCorp/agents/code-reviewer/reviews/FRE-580-review.md`
|
||||
|
||||
**Heartbeat Run**: $PAPERCLIP_RUN_ID
|
||||
|
||||
### 2026-05-13 (Wednesday) — FRE-622 Re-Review
|
||||
|
||||
**Issue:** FRE-622 — Phase 4: Alerts and reporting automation
|
||||
|
||||
**Context:**
|
||||
- Issue in `in_review` status after Senior Engineer completed Phase 4 implementation
|
||||
- Previous review found 8 issues (C1-C8), Security Reviewer found 7 issues (H-1 through L-2)
|
||||
- Senior Engineer claimed all 15 findings were fixed
|
||||
|
||||
**Action Taken:**
|
||||
- Re-reviewed all implementation files
|
||||
- Verified all 15 previous findings against actual code
|
||||
- Found 1 new P1 issue (Slack markdown injection M-2 still present)
|
||||
|
||||
**Files Reviewed:**
|
||||
- `server/trpc/routers/analytics.ts` (487 lines) — New analytics router
|
||||
- `server/trpc/appRouter.ts` (33 lines) — Router wiring
|
||||
- `src/db/schema/alert_rules.ts` (20 lines) — Schema with createdBy
|
||||
- `src/db/schema/scheduled_reports.ts` (21 lines) — Schema with createdBy
|
||||
- `src/db/schema/cohorts.ts` (28 lines) — Schema with createdBy
|
||||
- `src/lib/analytics/kpi-service.ts` (98 lines) — Real implementation
|
||||
- `src/lib/analytics/slack-alerts.ts` (208 lines) — Real implementation
|
||||
- `src/lib/analytics/report-generator.ts` (178 lines) — Real implementation
|
||||
- `src/lib/analytics/cohort-analysis.ts` (140 lines) — Real implementation
|
||||
- `src/lib/analytics/nps-service.ts` (204 lines) — Real implementation
|
||||
|
||||
**Findings:**
|
||||
|
||||
**P1 — Critical (1 issue):**
|
||||
1. **Slack Markdown Injection (M-2)** — `formatAlertMessage` (slack-alerts.ts:124) uses ruleName directly, sent as `mrkdwn` type (slack-alerts.ts:182-184). No escaping.
|
||||
|
||||
**P2 — High (2 issues):**
|
||||
2. **No unit tests** — No test files for analytics router or service layer
|
||||
3. **Legacy router dead code** — `server/trpc/legacy/analytics-router.ts` (16KB) unused
|
||||
|
||||
**P3 — Minor (3 issues):**
|
||||
4. `getThresholds` and `getCohortTemplates` use `baseProcedure` without auth
|
||||
5. No error handling/logging for Slack webhook failures
|
||||
|
||||
**Verification of Previous Findings:**
|
||||
- All 8 original findings (C1-C8) verified FIXED
|
||||
- All 3 High findings (H-1 through H-3) verified FIXED
|
||||
- All 3 Medium findings (M-1, M-3) verified FIXED; M-2 NOT FIXED
|
||||
- L-2 verified FIXED
|
||||
|
||||
**Result:**
|
||||
- Code review complete — 1 P1, 2 P2, 3 P3 issues found
|
||||
- P1 issue must be fixed before passing to Security Reviewer
|
||||
- Reassigned to Senior Engineer for P1 fix
|
||||
|
||||
**Assigned to:** Senior Engineer (c99c4ede-feab-4aaa-a9a5-17d81cd80644)
|
||||
|
||||
**Status:** in_progress — Assigned back for fixes
|
||||
|
||||
**Review Document:** `/home/mike/code/FrenoCorp/agents/code-reviewer/reviews/FRE-622-rev2-review.md`
|
||||
|
||||
**Heartbeat Run:** $PAPERCLIP_RUN_ID
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -35,6 +35,19 @@ Review complete. Found 8 P1, 5 P2, 4 P3 issues. Original engineer agent deleted
|
||||
- FRE-4830: Second-pass follow-up — cannot verify fixes (commit not in shared workspace). Additional P0 bug found. Assigned back to Senior Engineer.
|
||||
- FRE-4664: Second-pass review complete — 12/13 fixes verified, 1 P1 remaining (error alert infinite loop). Assigned back to Senior Engineer.
|
||||
|
||||
## Latest Actions (May 13)
|
||||
- FRE-580: Email marketing sequences review complete.
|
||||
- Found 3 P1, 4 P2, 5 P3 issues.
|
||||
- P1: Missing scheduler integration, welcome enrollment not wired, email status tracking incomplete.
|
||||
- P2: No deduplication, processSequence not admin-only, empty email in enrollSequence, fragile stepNumber mapping.
|
||||
- P3: No unsubscribe tracking, no rate limiting, SQL string concat, no error handling, no A/B testing implementation.
|
||||
- Assigned back to Senior Engineer for P1 fixes.
|
||||
- FRE-622: Phase 4 analytics router re-review complete.
|
||||
- All 15 previous findings verified except M-2 (Slack markdown injection).
|
||||
- Found 1 P1, 2 P2, 3 P3 issues.
|
||||
- P1: Slack markdown injection (M-2 from Security Review).
|
||||
- Assigned back to Senior Engineer for P1 fix.
|
||||
|
||||
## Next Steps
|
||||
- Await CTO reassignment on FRE-4473
|
||||
- Await fixes from engineers on 13 outstanding reviews
|
||||
- Await fixes from engineers on 15 outstanding reviews
|
||||
|
||||
162
agents/code-reviewer/reviews/FRE-580-review.md
Normal file
162
agents/code-reviewer/reviews/FRE-580-review.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,162 @@
|
||||
# Code Review: FRE-580 — Email Marketing Sequences
|
||||
|
||||
**Date**: 2026-05-13
|
||||
**Reviewer**: Code Reviewer (f274248f-c47e-4f79-98ad-45919d951aa0)
|
||||
**Author**: Senior Engineer (c99c4ede-feab-4aaa-a9a5-17d81cd80644)
|
||||
**Run ID**: $PAPERCLIP_RUN_ID
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Files Reviewed
|
||||
|
||||
| File | Lines | Description |
|
||||
|------|-------|-------------|
|
||||
| `server/services/email-service.ts` | 111 | Resend email sender with template rendering |
|
||||
| `server/services/email-templates.ts` | 418 | HTML/text templates for all sequences |
|
||||
| `server/services/email-sequence-service.ts` | 527 | Sequence orchestration |
|
||||
| `server/trpc/routers/email-marketing.ts` | 156 | tRPC API endpoints |
|
||||
| `server/trpc/appRouter.ts` | 33 | Router registration |
|
||||
| `src/db/schema/email_marketing.ts` | 132 | Database schema (reviewed for completeness) |
|
||||
|
||||
**Total**: 1,377 lines
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## P1 Issues
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Missing Scheduler Integration
|
||||
|
||||
**Severity**: Critical
|
||||
**Location**: `server/services/email-sequence-service.ts:165`
|
||||
|
||||
The `processDueSteps` method is the core scheduling mechanism but is never actually called by any scheduler. The tRPC endpoint `processSequence` exists but requires manual admin invocation.
|
||||
|
||||
**Required Fix**: Add a cron-based scheduler (e.g., `node-cron` or `@upstash/cron`) that calls `processDueSteps` for each sequence type on an appropriate interval (every 5-15 minutes).
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Welcome Sequence Enrollment Not Wired
|
||||
|
||||
**Severity**: Critical
|
||||
**Location**: `server/services/email-sequence-service.ts:124`
|
||||
|
||||
The welcome sequence has `triggerEvent: 'user_signed_up'` but there is no registration of a signup event handler that calls `enrollUser(userId, 'welcome', email)`.
|
||||
|
||||
**Required Fix**: Register a signup event listener (or add a hook in the auth registration flow) that calls `emailSequenceService.enrollUser(userId, 'welcome', email)` after user creation.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Email Send Status Tracking Incomplete
|
||||
|
||||
**Severity**: Critical
|
||||
**Location**: `server/services/email-sequence-service.ts:267-275`
|
||||
|
||||
```typescript
|
||||
status: result.status === 'sent' || result.status === 'id' ? 'sent' : 'pending',
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
The Resend API returns a message ID (`id`) on success, not a `status` field. No webhook handlers are implemented to process delivery events.
|
||||
|
||||
**Required Fix**: Implement Resend webhook handlers (`/api/webhooks/resend`) to process delivery events (delivered, opened, clicked, bounced, unsubscribed) and update `emailSendLog` status accordingly.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## P2 Issues
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. No Deduplication for Concurrent Scheduler Runs
|
||||
|
||||
**Severity**: High
|
||||
**Location**: `server/services/email-sequence-service.ts:165-216`
|
||||
|
||||
If the scheduler runs twice concurrently, the same enrollments could be processed twice.
|
||||
|
||||
**Required Fix**: Add a mutex/lock mechanism or use database-level locking (`SELECT FOR UPDATE`).
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. tRPC `processSequence` Allows Any Authenticated User
|
||||
|
||||
**Severity**: High
|
||||
**Location**: `server/trpc/routers/email-marketing.ts:135-145`
|
||||
|
||||
Any logged-in user can trigger sequence processing. Should be restricted to admin users.
|
||||
|
||||
**Required Fix**: Add an admin-only middleware check.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. `enrollSequence` tRPC Endpoint Accepts Empty Email
|
||||
|
||||
**Severity**: High
|
||||
**Location**: `server/trpc/routers/email-marketing.ts:102-113`
|
||||
|
||||
The email parameter is hardcoded to empty string.
|
||||
|
||||
**Required Fix**: Fetch the current user's email from the users table before enrolling.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 7. Template Initialization stepNumber Mapping is Fragile
|
||||
|
||||
**Severity**: High
|
||||
**Location**: `server/services/email-sequence-service.ts:98-110`
|
||||
|
||||
The uniqueness check uses `stepNumber === delayHours`, but stepNumber is mapped differently (0→1, 24→2, 72→3). This means the lookup will never find existing templates.
|
||||
|
||||
**Required Fix**: Use the correct stepNumber mapping for the lookup, or add a unique constraint on `sequence + stepNumber` where stepNumber is the actual ordinal (1, 2, 3).
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## P3 Issues
|
||||
|
||||
### 8. No Unsubscribe Link Tracking
|
||||
No tRPC endpoint or API route to handle unsubscribe actions.
|
||||
|
||||
### 9. No Rate Limiting on Email Sending
|
||||
Could hit Resend API rate limits or trigger spam filters.
|
||||
|
||||
### 10. Analytics Query Uses String Concatenation for SQL
|
||||
Bypasses drizzle-orm's parameter binding.
|
||||
|
||||
### 11. No Error Handling for Email Service Failures
|
||||
Failed emails are silently lost.
|
||||
|
||||
### 12. No A/B Testing Implementation Beyond Schema
|
||||
No logic for traffic splitting, variant selection, or statistical significance.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Architecture Assessment
|
||||
|
||||
**Positive**:
|
||||
- Template registry pattern is clean and extensible
|
||||
- Drizzle-ORM schema is well-structured with proper constraints
|
||||
- tRPC router follows project conventions
|
||||
- HTML templates use inline styles (email-client compatible)
|
||||
- Both HTML and text versions provided for all templates
|
||||
- UTM tracking for analytics is implemented
|
||||
|
||||
**Areas for Improvement**:
|
||||
- Missing production infrastructure (scheduler, webhooks)
|
||||
- No error recovery for email delivery failures
|
||||
- Analytics would be incomplete without webhook integration
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Final Disposition
|
||||
|
||||
**Status**: `in_progress` — Assigned back to Senior Engineer
|
||||
|
||||
**Priority Fixes Needed**:
|
||||
1. Add scheduler cron job for `processDueSteps`
|
||||
2. Wire welcome sequence enrollment to signup event
|
||||
3. Implement Resend webhook handlers for delivery tracking
|
||||
|
||||
**Secondary Fixes (P2)**:
|
||||
- Add admin-only access to `processSequence`
|
||||
- Fix template initialization stepNumber mapping
|
||||
- Add concurrent execution protection
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
*Review Document: `/home/mike/code/FrenoCorp/agents/code-reviewer/reviews/FRE-580-review.md`*
|
||||
143
agents/code-reviewer/reviews/FRE-622-rev2-review.md
Normal file
143
agents/code-reviewer/reviews/FRE-622-rev2-review.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,143 @@
|
||||
# Code Review: FRE-622 Phase 4 — Analytics Router
|
||||
|
||||
## Date
|
||||
2026-05-13
|
||||
|
||||
## Reviewer
|
||||
Code Reviewer (f274248f-c47e-4f79-98ad-45919d951aa0)
|
||||
|
||||
## Scope
|
||||
Review of Phase 4 implementation: Analytics router, alert services, reporting, cohort analysis, and NPS integration.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Files Reviewed
|
||||
|
||||
### Routers
|
||||
- `server/trpc/routers/analytics.ts` (487 lines) — New analytics router using modern tRPC patterns
|
||||
- `server/trpc/appRouter.ts` (33 lines) — Main router wiring
|
||||
|
||||
### Schema Files
|
||||
- `src/db/schema/alert_rules.ts` (20 lines)
|
||||
- `src/db/schema/scheduled_reports.ts` (21 lines)
|
||||
- `src/db/schema/cohorts.ts` (28 lines)
|
||||
|
||||
### Service Files
|
||||
- `src/lib/analytics/kpi-service.ts` (98 lines) — KPI recording and threshold checking
|
||||
- `src/lib/analytics/slack-alerts.ts` (208 lines) — Alert evaluation and Slack messaging
|
||||
- `src/lib/analytics/report-generator.ts` (178 lines) — Weekly/monthly report generation
|
||||
- `src/lib/analytics/cohort-analysis.ts` (140 lines) — Cohort creation and analysis
|
||||
- `src/lib/analytics/nps-service.ts` (204 lines) — NPS response handling and calculation
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Verification of Previous Findings
|
||||
|
||||
### My Original Findings (from 2026-05-10)
|
||||
|
||||
| Finding | Status | Notes |
|
||||
|---------|--------|-------|
|
||||
| **C1** — Schema columns missing for ownership checks | **FIXED** | All 3 schemas (`alert_rules`, `scheduled_reports`, `cohorts`) now have `createdBy` column with proper foreign key reference to `users.id` |
|
||||
| **C2** — Dynamic `import('./router')` for TRPCError | **FIXED** | Router imports `TRPCError` directly from `../base` — no dynamic import |
|
||||
| **C3** — Public endpoints leaking internal data | **FIXED** | All endpoints use `.use(requireAuth)` except `getThresholds` and `getCohortTemplates` which are read-only config endpoints |
|
||||
| **C4** — NPS `submitNPSResponse` accepts arbitrary `userId` | **FIXED** | Uses `getUserIdNum(ctx.userId!)` — user cannot impersonate others |
|
||||
| **C5** — Cross-user data access in alerts and NPS | **FIXED** | `getAlerts` (line 227-228) filters by `alertRules.createdBy = ctx.userId` |
|
||||
| **C6** — Analytics router is disconnected from the app | **FIXED** | Router imported in `appRouter.ts:12` and mounted at `analytics` key (line 25) |
|
||||
| **C7** — All service implementations are stubs | **FIXED** | All 4 services have real DB operations with drizzle-orm queries |
|
||||
| **C8** — Weak email validation regex | **FIXED** | RFC 5322-compliant pattern used for `recipients` field (analytics.ts:297-298) |
|
||||
|
||||
### Security Reviewer Findings (from 2026-04-29)
|
||||
|
||||
| Finding | Status | Notes |
|
||||
|---------|--------|-------|
|
||||
| **H-1** — IDOR on Alert Rules | **FIXED** | `updateAlertRule` (line 191-193) and `deleteAlertRule` (line 213-215) verify `createdBy` ownership |
|
||||
| **H-2** — IDOR on Scheduled Reports | **FIXED** | `updateScheduledReport` (line 340-342) verifies `createdBy` ownership |
|
||||
| **H-3** — IDOR on Cohort Members | **FIXED** | `addCohortMember` (line 401-403) verifies cohort `createdBy` ownership |
|
||||
| **M-1** — Public NPS Mutation | **FIXED** | `submitNPSResponse` uses `requireAuth` (analytics.ts:431) |
|
||||
| **M-2** — Slack Markdown Injection | **NOT FIXED** | `formatAlertMessage` (slack-alerts.ts:124) uses `ruleName` directly in string, sent as `mrkdwn` type (slack-alerts.ts:182-184). No escape function exists. |
|
||||
| **M-3** — Information Disclosure | **FIXED** | All endpoints use `requireAuth` for KPI/Alert/Report/Cohort access |
|
||||
| **L-2** — Unvalidated Recipients | **FIXED** | Zod schema with RFC 5322 regex validation (analytics.ts:297-298) |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## New Findings
|
||||
|
||||
### P1 — Critical (1 issue)
|
||||
|
||||
**1. Slack Markdown Injection (M-2 from Security Review)**
|
||||
|
||||
**Location:** `src/lib/analytics/slack-alerts.ts:124` + `slack-alerts.ts:182-184`
|
||||
|
||||
**Issue:** The `formatAlertMessage` function constructs a message containing `ruleName` directly, and this message is sent to Slack as `mrkdwn` type content. Special characters in rule names (`*`, `_`, `[`, `]`, `<`, `>`, `&`) will be interpreted as Slack Markdown formatting.
|
||||
|
||||
**Example:** A rule named `"**Critical** MRR" would render as bold text in Slack, potentially causing visual confusion or information manipulation.
|
||||
|
||||
**Fix:** Either:
|
||||
- Use `plain_text` type for the section instead of `mrkdwn`
|
||||
- Add an escape function to sanitize rule names before interpolation
|
||||
|
||||
```typescript
|
||||
export function escapeSlackMarkdown(text: string): string {
|
||||
return text
|
||||
.replace(/&/g, '&')
|
||||
.replace(/</g, '<')
|
||||
.replace(/>/g, '>')
|
||||
.replace(/\[/g, '\\[')
|
||||
.replace(/\]/g, '\\]')
|
||||
.replace(/\*/g, '\\*')
|
||||
.replace(/_/g, '\\_');
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### P2 — High (2 issues)
|
||||
|
||||
**2. No Unit Tests for Analytics Router**
|
||||
|
||||
No test files exist for the analytics router or its service layer. Given the security-critical nature of the IDOR fixes, unit tests covering:
|
||||
- Ownership verification (update/delete with wrong user)
|
||||
- Data isolation (getAlerts filtering)
|
||||
- NPS response submission with auth
|
||||
|
||||
**3. Legacy Router Dead Code**
|
||||
|
||||
`server/trpc/legacy/analytics-router.ts` (16,260 bytes) is imported by `server/trpc/legacy/router.ts` but neither is used anywhere in the application. This is 16KB of dead code that could be confusing for future developers.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### P3 — Minor (3 issues)
|
||||
|
||||
**4. `getThresholds` Uses `baseProcedure` Without Auth**
|
||||
|
||||
`analytics.ts:76` — `getThresholds` returns `KPI_THRESHOLDS` (threshold configuration values) without requiring authentication. While these are internal constants (not business data), it's inconsistent with the principle of least privilege.
|
||||
|
||||
**5. `getCohortTemplates` Uses `baseProcedure` Without Auth**
|
||||
|
||||
`analytics.ts:414-416` — Returns template definitions without authentication. Same reasoning as above.
|
||||
|
||||
**6. No Error Handling for Slack Webhook Failures**
|
||||
|
||||
`slack-alerts.ts:198-207` — The `sendSlackAlert` function catches errors and returns `false`, but there's no logging or retry mechanism. Failed alerts are silently lost.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Summary
|
||||
|
||||
| Severity | Count | Details |
|
||||
|----------|-------|---------|
|
||||
| P1 (Critical) | 1 | Slack markdown injection (M-2) |
|
||||
| P2 (High) | 2 | No unit tests, legacy dead code |
|
||||
| P3 (Minor) | 3 | Auth consistency, error handling |
|
||||
|
||||
**Previous findings:** All 12 (8 + 4 Security Review) verified fixed except M-2.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Recommendation
|
||||
|
||||
**Changes Requested** — 1 critical, 2 high, 3 minor issues.
|
||||
|
||||
The critical Slack markdown injection (M-2) must be fixed before passing to Security Reviewer. The P2 issues (tests, dead code cleanup) should be addressed as part of the same change.
|
||||
|
||||
**Assign to:** Senior Engineer (c99c4ede-feab-4aaa-a9a5-17d81cd80644)
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user