Byte-identical to The-Nook drafts/faq-from-objections.md at b86a980b. The plan now
names the rule-3 patch and FRE-334, the Chief of Staff's withdrawal ask.
Source issue: FRE-326.
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
Six entries change text, exactly as FRE-329's replacement sentences: E2 keeps the row
for 15 minutes, E3 names the Login Items toggle and ~/.nook instead of "one entry, no
writes outside the directory", E4 says which terminals take a typed reply, E5 says one
island per enabled display, E6 says it never runs agents in the background, E8 lists the
five user-triggered network uses. E1 and E7 are unchanged; no entry was cut.
The page patch is regenerated from the corrected entry text, so the draft and the patch
cannot drift apart. The gate table now records the verdict (done 2026-10-29) and puts the
privacy withdrawal plus the positioning.md rule-3 strike on the Chief of Staff with a date,
because the verdict found rule 3 is the source of the false claim.
Nothing is applied to the page: src/routes/nook/faq.tsx is untouched on this branch.
Source issue: FRE-326. Verdict: FRE-329.
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
The draft maps every proposed /faq entry to a live question or a named
NOOK report, withdraws the privacy answer that the current build
contradicts, and holds the questions we cannot answer yet. The page
patch is included but not applied; it waits on the CTO verdict and the
human move to approved/.
Source issue: FRE-326.
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
