Commit Graph

8 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
fixture
e12a063aa9 marketing: FRE-199 third pair of informational pages (drafts) + pitch narrowed to the no-figure shape
Pair 3 (internal target Thu 2026-11-12, six days early):
- agent-worktree-contention — 'How do you manage worktrees when your agents
  end up waiting on each other?' (backlog 1xlz2bs, Scan 6 #4); git worktree +
  Docker Compose project-name docs fetched and read 2026-11-05.
- agent-keeps-asking — 'Why does your coding agent keep stopping to ask you
  questions?' (handback cluster: 1xlfqmo, 1xk0ghj, 1xlxw0q); permission +
  hooks claims re-verified live 2026-11-05 against code.claude.com; the
  1xlfqmo poster's measurement figures deliberately not cited.

Pitch narrowed per CTO reopening verdict: trial→paid placeholder deleted
(FRE-202 cohort too young; ratio waits for FRE-197), second breakage chosen
(NOOK-815 uninvoked suite), any count named as activations, downloads never
quoted.
2026-11-05 22:54:53 +00:00
fixture
4dac2e2928 marketing: FRE-199 fact-check verdict applied — second pair drafts/ → approved/
Sponsor fact-check card (FRE-199, interaction a7cba232) answered 2026-11-05
20:21Z: 'Approve both — move to approved/'. Status blockquotes updated to
record the verdict and the date; page bodies untouched.
2026-11-05 20:23:03 +00:00
fixture
c5fb98af8d marketing: FRE-199 second pair of informational pages (drafts)
- agent-parallel-tracking/ — 'How do you keep track of multiple coding
  agents?' — the multi-agent attention cluster (1xmzp2n, 1xh5cum, 1xdjb2g,
  1xipsk0, 1xk0ghj); answered with documented per-session hook events
  (session_id, typed Notification matchers) and the status line.
- agent-run-without-asking/ — 'Should you let your coding agent run without
  asking permission?' — the autonomy cluster (1xexhwf, 1xk8imc, 1xk277d);
  answered with the permission-mode ladder, the docs' own container/VM
  warning, rule precedence, sandboxing pointer, PreToolUse deny.

Internal target Mon 2026-11-09; drafted 2026-11-05. All doc claims re-read
2026-11-05 against code.claude.com (permissions, hooks, statusline). Ban
compliance: no product of ours, no competitor, no handles, no price, no
invented figures.
2026-11-05 19:58:59 +00:00
fixture
77e692273e marketing: FRE-199 fact-check verdict applied — first pair drafts/ → approved/
Sponsor fact-check card (FRE-199, interaction 0101ee80) answered 2026-11-05
19:53Z: 'Approve both — move to approved/'. Status blockquotes updated to
record the verdict and the date; page bodies untouched.
2026-11-05 19:54:45 +00:00
CMO (FrenoCorp agent)
a58b25501a marketing: FRE-199 first pair of informational pages + pitch shape (drafts)
- agent-done-signal: 'How do you know when your coding agent is done?' —
  the zero-looks-like-success cluster (1xjb3j0, 1xm09fs, 1xmnz2c, HN fhub/
  sadilek); Stop/Notification/StopFailure hooks cited to the agent's own
  docs, re-read 2026-11-05. No product, no competitor, no price.
- agent-waiting-on-permission: 'Why is my coding agent sitting on a
  permission prompt?' — the 1xhbc71 thread + invisible-permission cluster;
  permission modes, /permissions, rule syntax, acceptEdits cited to the
  permissions doc; undo-split attributed to 1xkoz06.
- newsletter-postmortem-pitch: item 2's shape, placeholders only; send
  gated on FRE-202 or a CTO-confirmed direct relay-store read.

All drafts: sponsor fact-check moves pending/ -> approved/; nothing
publishes itself.
2026-11-05 19:09:46 +00:00
Freno CMO
578ee58f9c marketing: the remote correction is committed, not deployed
copy.md said the sentences were "removed from the live site" and
rationale.md said "the landing page now says only what the product can back
today". Neither is true: nook.freno.me still serves all of them (HTTP 200,
re-fetched 2026-10-29T14:20Z) because the push is blocked on a write
credential (card 82d1e1b7). Both files now say committed-not-deployed, and
positioning.md's excluded-count row records FRE-359 verdict B and where the
count was removed.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-29 14:22:12 +00:00
Paperclip Agent
c1c498e37f site: remove the unproven remote claim from the Nook landing page
FRE-323. The one-click remote install is app-UI-only and needs hand-edited ~/.ssh/config plus a one-time ssh-copy-id (FRE-320); FRE-315 and FRE-322 hold the claim unverified and demo-gated.

- drop the Remote tile and its mock from the feature collage
- drop the "Any SSH box, one click away" breakdown, its demo and bullets
- drop "Works across every hooked agent, local or remote"
- drop the "One-click SSH setup" chip
- move the copy to marketing/drafts/remote-ssh/ and mark remote held in marketing/positioning.md

No replacement claim was added. Deploy waits on a push credential for the GitHub repo Vercel builds.
2026-10-29 05:55:26 +00:00
b41cf83879 marketing: add the scaffolding and positioning source of truth
One voice, one place, so agent-drafted assets stop inventing framing
per artifact. positioning.md carries the wedge, the category-noun rule
(freno-dev/AGENTS.md competitor ban), claims each backed by code, the
honest privacy scoping and the voice/banned-phrasings list. The tree
adds calendar.json, per-channel briefs, drafts → pending → approved →
posted, metrics and listening — with the hard rule up front: approved/
is the only thing a human ever publishes from, nothing posts itself.

Issue: FRE-17
2026-10-04 23:22:28 -04:00