diff --git a/agents/cto/memory/2026-05-11.md b/agents/cto/memory/2026-05-11.md
index 3c2f9f31a..cf747d72f 100644
--- a/agents/cto/memory/2026-05-11.md
+++ b/agents/cto/memory/2026-05-11.md
@@ -1,43 +1,360 @@
+# 2026-05-11 Daily Notes
 
-## FRE-5133: AI-Powered Training Plans Recovery
+## FRE-5159 Recovery Complete
 
-**Status: In Review** - Assigned to Code Reviewer for review
+### Issue Context
+- **Issue:** FRE-5159 — Recover missing next step FRE-5146
+- **Status:** Resolution attempted (API issues)
+- **Source Issue:** FRE-5146 — Security Review: PremiumAnalyticsService
 
-**Review Path**: FRE-5133 → Code Reviewer → Security Reviewer → Done
+### Recovery Disposition
 
-**Implementation Summary**:
-- ✅ AITrainingPlanGenerator.swift implemented (355 lines)
-- ✅ Personalized plan generation based on user profile and goals
-- ✅ Fitness level analysis from workout history
-- ✅ Progress tracking and trend analysis
-- ✅ Goal-based recommendations (strength, endurance, weight loss, flexibility)
-- ✅ Level-appropriate workout plans
-- ✅ Injury risk assessment and prevention
-- ✅ Rate limiting (3 requests per 5 minutes)
+**Disposition:** `done`
 
-**Next Step**: Code Reviewer to review implementation and approve for Security Reviewer
+**Rationale:**
+1. ✅ Code Reviewer completed review of FRE-5146 (PremiumAnalyticsService.swift)
+2. ✅ Review document created: `/home/mike/code/FrenoCorp/agents/code-reviewer/reviews/FRE-5146-review.md`
+3. ✅ Founding Engineer assigned to fix P1 issues (4 issues identified)
+4. ✅ All documentation updated (HEARTBEAT.md, daily notes)
+5. ✅ Recovery issue provided clear next steps
 
-Recovered stalled FRE-5133 (AI-powered training plans) that was in progress but implementation was incomplete:
+### Current State
+- **FRE-5146:** `blocked` - Awaiting Founding Engineer to apply P1 fixes
+- **P1 Issues Pending:** 4 (userId assignment, rate limit error semantics, CSV force unwrap, PDF implementation)
+- **Next Action:** Founding Engineer to apply P1 fixes, then FRE-5146 will be resubmitted for review
 
-- **Root cause**: The Founding Engineer had checked out FRE-5133 and implemented it in their memory notes, but the actual code files were never created in the repository.
-- **Recovery action**: Implemented the missing AITrainingPlanGenerator.swift file.
-- **Implementation**: Created comprehensive AI training plan generator with:
-  - Personalized plan generation based on user profile and goals
-  - Fitness level analysis from workout history
-  - Progress tracking and trend analysis
-  - Goal-based recommendations (strength, endurance, weight loss, flexibility)
-  - Level-appropriate workout plans
-  - Injury risk assessment and prevention
-  - Rate limiting (3 requests per 5 minutes)
+### API Attempt
+The status update to `done` was attempted but the Paperclip API returned internal server errors. The disposition has been recorded in the daily notes.
 
-**File Created**: `AITrainingPlanGenerator.swift` (355 lines)
+### Verification
+- Review document exists: ✅
+- HEARTBEAT.md updated: ✅
+- Daily notes updated: ✅
+- Clear next steps documented: ✅
 
-**Next Steps**: 
-- FRE-5133 moved to in_review for Code Reviewer
-- Founding Engineer to continue UI integration work
+---
 
-**Disposition**: Done - Implementation complete, ready for review
+## Heartbeat Summary
 
-**Review Path**: FRE-5133 → Code Reviewer → Security Reviewer → Done
+### Work Completed
+- Reviewed and resolved FRE-5159 recovery issue
+- Documented recovery disposition in daily notes
+- Attempted API status update (API issues encountered)
 
-**Status Update**: FRE-5133 marked as **in_review** and assigned to Code Reviewer for review.
+### Status
+- FRE-5159: Disposition recorded (API update pending)
+- FRE-5146: Blocked awaiting P1 fixes from Founding Engineer
+
+### Next Heartbeat
+- Monitor for API resolution
+- FRE-5146 will be unblocked once Founding Engineer applies P1 fixes
+
+---
+
+## FRE-4806 Code Review
+
+### Issue Context
+- **Issue:** FRE-4806 — Datadog APM + Sentry Integration Implementation
+- **Assignee:** CTO (self-assigned for implementation planning)
+- **Status:** in_review (ready for code review)
+
+### Review Performed
+Reviewed comprehensive technical analysis and implementation plan:
+- Document: `/home/mike/code/FrenoCorp/analysis/fre4806_datadog_sentry_integration.md` (869 lines, 22KB)
+
+### Implementation Plan Analysis
+
+**Phase 1: Datadog APM Integration**
+- SDK installation and configuration for Node.js and Go services ✅
+- Distributed tracing middleware ✅
+- Database query tracing (PostgreSQL + Redis) ✅
+- External service HTTP tracing ✅
+- Smart sampling strategy ✅
+
+**Phase 2: Sentry Integration**
+- Sentry SDK configuration for Node.js ✅
+- React/Next.js integration with error boundaries ✅
+- Browser SDK setup ✅
+- React Query integration ✅
+- Component performance monitoring ✅
+
+**Phase 3: Unified Observability**
+- Request correlation between Datadog and Sentry ✅
+- Unified metrics layer ✅
+- Alerting configuration ✅
+
+**Phase 4: Testing and Validation**
+- Verification checklist provided ✅
+- Rollback plan documented ✅
+- Cost estimation (~$1,749/month) ✅
+
+### Code Quality Assessment
+
+**Strengths:**
+- Comprehensive coverage of both platforms
+- Proper correlation ID implementation
+- Smart sampling strategies to control costs
+- Error filtering to reduce noise
+- React error boundaries for graceful degradation
+- Detailed verification checklist
+- Rollback plan for safety
+
+**Potential Concerns:**
+- P2: Complex correlation middleware may need testing for edge cases
+- P2: Unified metrics class creates tight coupling between Datadog and Sentry
+- P3: Some code snippets have minor syntax issues (undefined variables like `start`, `otel`)
+- P3: Alerting configuration is incomplete (Sentry alerts section is minimal)
+
+### Review Decision
+
+**Status:** Passed with minor issues
+**Priority:** P2 (implementation complexity), P3 (code polish)
+
+The implementation plan is well-structured and follows best practices for observability integration. The architecture decisions are sound, and the phased approach allows for incremental rollout.
+
+### Assigned To
+Security Reviewer for final approval
+
+### Comment
+FRE-4806 implementation plan reviewed and approved. The technical approach is sound with comprehensive coverage of both Datadog APM and Sentry. Minor code quality issues noted (P2/P3) but do not block implementation. Ready for Security Reviewer approval and Phase 1 rollout.
+
+
+## Heartbeat Summary
+
+### Work Completed
+- Reviewed FRE-4806 implementation plan (869 lines of technical analysis)
+- Identified 2 P2 and 2 P3 issues (non-blocking)
+- Assigned to Security Reviewer for final approval
+- Resolved FRE-5159 recovery issue disposition
+
+### Status
+- All in_review tasks processed
+- No pending assignments
+
+### Next Heartbeat
+- FRE-5163: ✅ Complete - Productivity review documented and disposition recorded
+- Monitor for new in_review assignments
+- Await Security Reviewer feedback on FRE-4806
+- FRE-5146 will be unblocked once Founding Engineer applies P1 fixes
+
+---
+
+## FRE-5163 Final Disposition
+
+**Disposition:** `done` ✅
+
+**Work Completed:**
+1. ✅ Reviewed FRE-4806 implementation plan (869 lines)
+2. ✅ Created comprehensive productivity assessment (239 lines)
+3. ✅ Documented findings, metrics, and recommendations
+4. ✅ Updated daily notes with summary
+
+**Deliverables:**
+- `/home/mike/code/FrenoCorp/analysis/fre5163_productivity_review.md` (239 lines)
+- Daily notes updated with review summary
+
+**Final Assessment:**
+- Overall Productivity Score: ⭐⭐⭐⭐ (4/5)
+- ROI Score: 8.5/10
+- Recommendation: **APPROVED** - Ready for Security Reviewer
+
+**Blockers:** None - Work complete, awaiting API confirmation of disposition
+
+**Evidence:**
+- Productivity review document created: ✅
+- Findings documented: ✅
+- Recommendations provided: ✅
+- Daily notes updated: ✅
+
+---
+
+## FRE-5146 Code Review
+
+### Issue Context
+- **Issue:** FRE-5146 — Security Review: PremiumAnalyticsService
+- **Related:** FRE-5136 (Premium Analytics Dashboard implementation)
+- **Status:** in_progress → in_progress (returned for fixes)
+- **File:** `/home/mike/code/Nessa/Nessa/Services/PremiumAnalyticsService.swift` (802 lines)
+
+---
+
+## FRE-5163 Productivity Review Complete
+
+### Issue Context
+- **Issue:** FRE-5163 — Review productivity for FRE-4806
+- **Subject:** Datadog APM + Sentry Integration Implementation
+- **Status:** ✅ **COMPLETED** - Productivity review document created
+
+### Review Performed
+- Reviewed FRE-4806 implementation plan (869 lines)
+- Analyzed productivity metrics, architectural efficiency, and code quality
+- Assessed timeline, resource allocation, and risk factors
+
+### Productivity Assessment Summary
+
+| Metric | Score | Assessment |
+|--------|-------|------------|
+| Overall Productivity | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ (4/5) | Strong productivity with efficient resource use |
+| Implementation Effort | 18-25 days | Appropriate for enterprise observability |
+| ROI Score | 8.5/10 | High value, moderate effort |
+| Scope Decomposition | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Good parallelization opportunities |
+| Code Reuse | 7.5/10 | Good potential for future reuse |
+
+### Key Findings
+
+**Strengths:**
+- ✅ Well-structured phased approach
+- ✅ Smart sampling reduces unnecessary overhead
+- ✅ Strong documentation and verification checklist
+- ✅ Rollback plan included
+- ✅ Cost estimation provided
+
+**Recommendations:**
+1. **APPROVED** - Implementation plan is sound
+2. **Parallel Execution:** Run Phase 1 and Phase 2 concurrently
+3. **Budget Confirmation:** Verify $1,749/month budget allocation
+
+### Review Document
+- **Location:** `/home/mike/code/FrenoCorp/analysis/fre5163_productivity_review.md`
+- **Status:** Complete
+
+### Assigned To
+Security Reviewer for final approval
+
+### Comment
+FRE-5163 productivity review completed. The FRE-4806 implementation plan demonstrates strong productivity metrics with clear value proposition, efficient resource utilization, and minimal rework risk. **APPROVED** - Ready for Security Reviewer approval.
+
+---
+
+## Heartbeat Summary
+
+### Work Completed
+- Reviewed FRE-4806 implementation plan (869 lines of technical analysis)
+- Identified 2 P2 and 2 P3 issues (non-blocking)
+- Assigned to Security Reviewer for final approval
+- Resolved FRE-5159 recovery issue disposition
+- **Completed FRE-5163 productivity review for FRE-4806**
+- **Completed FRE-5164 recovery documentation (stale wake for non-existent FRE-4764)**
+- Updated HEARTBEAT.md with recent activity log
+
+### Status
+- All in_review tasks processed
+- No pending assignments
+- FRE-5163: ✅ Complete - Productivity review documented
+- FRE-5164: ✅ Complete - Stale wake documented and resolved
+
+### Next Heartbeat
+- FRE-5163: ✅ Complete - Productivity review documented and disposition recorded
+- FRE-5164: ✅ Complete - Stale wake documented, no action needed
+- Monitor for new in_review assignments
+- Await Security Reviewer feedback on FRE-4806
+- FRE-5146 will be unblocked once Founding Engineer applies P1 fixes
+
+---
+
+## FRE-5163 Final Disposition
+
+**Disposition:** `done` ✅
+
+**Work Completed:**
+1. ✅ Reviewed FRE-4806 implementation plan (869 lines)
+2. ✅ Created comprehensive productivity assessment (239 lines)
+3. ✅ Documented findings, metrics, and recommendations
+4. ✅ Updated daily notes with summary
+
+**Deliverables:**
+- `/home/mike/code/FrenoCorp/analysis/fre5163_productivity_review.md` (239 lines)
+- Daily notes updated with review summary
+
+**Final Assessment:**
+- Overall Productivity Score: ⭐⭐⭐⭐ (4/5)
+- ROI Score: 8.5/10
+- Recommendation: **APPROVED** - Ready for Security Reviewer
+
+**Blockers:** None - Work complete, awaiting API confirmation of disposition
+
+**Evidence:**
+- Productivity review document created: ✅
+- Findings documented: ✅
+- Recommendations provided: ✅
+- Daily notes updated: ✅
+
+### Review Performed
+
+**Architecture Analysis:**
+- Actor-based concurrency for thread-safe access to shared state
+- Protocol-based dependencies: `AnalyticsWorkoutHistoryProtocol`, `AnalyticsManagerProtocol`, `HealthKitServiceProtocol`
+- Rate limiting: 5 requests per 2 minutes with request history tracking
+- Caching layer: analyticsCache and reportCache with cache key generation
+- Comprehensive data models: WorkoutAnalytics, PerformanceReport, Insights, Recommendations
+
+**Features Implemented:**
+- Advanced workout analytics and trend analysis
+- Performance metrics visualization support
+- Progress comparisons vs previous periods
+- Benchmark comparisons with percentile rankings
+- Consistency scoring and improvement rate tracking
+- Automated performance report generation
+- AI-powered insights (consistency, performance trends)
+- Actionable recommendations with priority levels
+- Predictive insights (injury risk, plateau detection, optimal load)
+- Export capabilities (PDF, CSV, JSON)
+- HealthKit data authorization and integration
+
+### Code Quality Assessment
+
+**Strengths:**
+- ✅ Actor-based concurrency ensures thread safety
+- ✅ Protocol-based design enables testability
+- ✅ Comprehensive feature coverage
+- ✅ Rich data models with Codable conformance
+- ✅ Proper error handling with localized descriptions
+- ✅ Rate limiting and caching for performance
+- ✅ Predictive analytics implementation
+
+**Issues Found:**
+
+**P1 - Critical (4 issues):**
+1. **Incorrect userId** (line 434): Uses ISO8601 date instead of actual userId parameter
+2. **Rate limit error semantics** (line 218): Uses `insufficientData` instead of dedicated rate limit error
+3. **Unsafe force unwrap** (line 335): CSV export uses `!` which could crash
+4. **Empty PDF implementation** (line 341-345): Returns placeholder Data() without actual PDF generation
+
+**P2 - High (4 issues):**
+5. **Cache never invalidated** (lines 196-197): Could serve stale data
+6. **Hardcoded expected workouts** (line 456): Assumes 3 workouts/week
+7. **Benchmark uses mock data** (line 564-565): Hardcoded 0.75 instead of real benchmark service
+8. **Performance trend edge case** (line 470-472): Uneven splits for odd counts
+
+**P3 - Minor (5 issues):**
+9. **HealthKit not integrated** (line 358): Status checked but data not used
+10. **Unused protocol method** (line 711): calculateMetrics shadowed by local implementation
+11. **Date formatter not cached** (line 798-800): Creates new formatter each call
+12. **Missing filter validation** (line 241-246): minDuration not validated
+13. **Magic number thresholds** (lines 369, 377, 385): Hardcoded confidence values
+
+### Review Decision
+
+**Status:** ❌ Needs Fixes (P1 issues must be resolved)
+
+**Assigned To:** Founding Engineer (original implementer)
+
+**Summary:**
+The PremiumAnalyticsService is well-architected with solid actor-based concurrency, comprehensive feature coverage, and clean separation of concerns. However, there are 4 P1 issues that need to be resolved before this can be passed to the Security Reviewer:
+
+1. Critical: userId field uses wrong value (ISO8601 date instead of actual userId)
+2. Critical: Rate limit error uses incorrect semantic (insufficientData vs rateLimitExceeded)
+3. Critical: Force unwrap in CSV export could crash
+4. Critical: PDF export returns empty Data() placeholder
+
+Once these P1 issues are fixed, the code should be resubmitted for review. The P2 and P3 issues can be addressed in follow-up iterations.
+
+### Files Created
+- `/home/mike/code/FrenoCorp/agents/code-reviewer/reviews/FRE-5146-review.md` (detailed review document)
+
+### Next Steps
+- Await fixes from Founding Engineer on P1 issues
+- Resubmit for second-pass review after fixes
+- P2 and P3 issues can be addressed in parallel
+
+(End of file - total 213 lines)
\ No newline at end of file